Global Warming or Hysteria?

Did the global flood (approx. 2348 B.C) occur because of man-made global warming? Will this event occur again in the 21st century?
Background history of climate reporting in the last century
We have all been bombarded with the media lately that man-made global warming is causing the oceans to rise, droughts, tornadoes, etc. High school and grade school students are being taught that this is scientific fact and they should take action. One should be aware of that for the last century the media has predicted a global climate crisis four different times--the media in the 1970's was promoting global cooling, other times it was global warming and they warned that "billions will die" with lower crop yields. An excerpt from Time magazine in its June 24, 1974 edition titled "Another Ice Age?":
As they review the bizarre and unpredictable weather pattern of the past several years, a growing number of scientists are beginning to suspect that many seemingly contradictory meteorological fluctuations are actually part of a global climatic upheaval. However, widely the weather varies from place to place and time to time, when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing. Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age.
U.S. Senator James Inhofe stated the following in regards to journalists' reporting on climate change: "for more than 100 years, journalists have quoted scientists predicting the destruction of civilization by, in alternation, either runaway heat or a new Ice Age."
Political reasons for supporting global warming
Since communism/socialism, the left's system for global domination, has been repudiated with its 150 millions dead under its system, the left/elite class have all gravitated toward radical environmentalism. The ideology has been more effective than communism because it appeals to our survival on earth. To quote from an article titled "Why all the Hysteria?" in Whistleblower (03/07) edition on the true intentions of the environmentalism movement:
Environmentalism is socialism revived; the Greens are the Reds incarnated, writes columnist Ilana Mercer, who quotes economist George Reisman as explaining: "A global central planning authority is implicit in all potential international efforts to combat alleged global problems."
Don't be fooled by the propaganda--it is about global governance that is ant-Western, anti-democratic, anti-capitalist, elitist and greedy. The politicians don't even hide their agenda. French President Jacques Chirac stated the following about the "Kyoto" agreement: "represents the first component of an authentic global governance."
Is there conclusive scientific proof that global warming is man-made?
A hundred distinguished scientists met in Leipzig, Germany on July 10, 1996 and released a joint statement:
There is still no scientific consensus on the subject of climate change. On the contrary, most scientists now accept the fact that actual observations from earth satellites show no climate warming whatsoever.
Robert Giegengack--a Geologist and professor at the University of Pennsylvania--told his undergrad students at the University of Pennsylvania in February: "Every single one of you knows more about [global warming] than Al Gore." The professor thought that Gore's understanding of climate science was very poor.
James Spann--Meteorologist--stated in January that he does "not know of a single TV meteorologist who buys into the man-made global warming hype" and noted that "billions of dollars of grant money is flowing into the pockets of those on the man-made global warming bandwagon."
Richard Lindzen--MIT scientist and former U.N. IPCC reviewer--called the fears of man-made global warming "silly" in January and equated concerns to "little kids" attempting to "scare each other."
Dr. Habibullo Abdussamatov--head of Space Research at Pulkovo Observatory in Russia--stated in January 2007: "It is no secret that increased solar irradiance warms Earth's oceans, which then triggers the emission of large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. So the common view that man's industrial activity is a deciding factor in global warming has emerged from a misinterpretation of cause and effect relations."
Henrik Svensmark and Eigil Friis-Christensen--two climate scientists--in 1997 presented their theory and its data on a possible link between galactic cosmic rays and global warming to the U.N. environmental agencies. The two scientists observed a direct correlation between the levels of cosmic radiation contacting our planet and low-altitude cloud formation. The low-altitude clouds contribute greatly to what is known as the "greenhouse effect". Henrik and Eigil were both ostracized with the academic community--however; scientists are now paying attention to this new research.
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper describes the Kyoto Protocol as a "socialist scheme" designed to suck money out of rich countries.
(It should be noted that land-based volcanoes are the greatest contributors to atmospheric CO2. Carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole have been shrinking for the last three summers, which data was taken from the NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions in 2005. The warming trends seem natural and not man-made.)
Are there monetary reasons for promoting global warming?
Yes, the corporations have been steered--by U.S. environmental groups--towards redefining social responsibility and created the Climate Action Partnership and an emerging Enviro-Industrial Complex. These radical activists can then use climate fears to raise billions of dollars. Morgan Stanley with the Environmental Defense (ED) are trying to promote emission trading systems. This would give ED direct monetary and policy stakes in the political arenas, banking, investment and any cap-and-trade or carbon allowance programs that could eventually be enacted by Congress. Corporate ethics could be redefined by these radical environmental humanists. Companies such as BP and DuPont could get money for biofuels, ADM for ethanol, Lehman Brothers for emission trading and GE for climate protection equipment.
(It should be noted Environmental Defense (ED) led the campaign to ban DDT, which resulted in millions of deaths from malaria in Africa. ED along with the Sierra Club, Greenpeace, Union of Concerned Scientists and other groups still post deceitful information on their websites about DDT. They are blaming global warming on this disease instead of admitting that their wicked actions caused it.)
Recommended resources and articles on global warming
- Comments on Draft Technical Support Document for Endangerment Analysis for Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the Clean Air Act by Alan Carlin of NCEE/OPEI in the EPA Office 03/09/09--PDF
- U.S. Senate Report: over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007—Senate Report Debunks “Consensus” (Report released on December 20, 2007)--PDF
- Global Warming…Science or Politics?--by a Honeywell International, Inc. engineer (Ret.)--PDF.
- Global Warming Petition Project -31,072 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,021 with Ph.D.s
www.petitionproject.org - APS Physics -Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered (Abstract written by Lord Christopher Monckton, the science advisor to Britain's Margaret Thatcher Administration-disagrees with IPCC's modeling)-PDF
- Myth of Consensus Explodes: APS Opens Global Warming Debate (DAILYTECH-04/16/08).
www.dailytech.com - Whistleblower (March 2007 edition)--Hysteria/Exposing the secret agenda behind today's obsession with global warming.
www.worldnetdaily.com - Sizzling study concludes: Global warming 'hot air'--08/20/07
www.worldnetdaily.com - Anti-greenhouse religion scorched by Czech prez
www.worldnetdaily.com - Are 'climate criminals' committing 'terracide'?
www.worldnetdaily.com - U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works
epw.senate.gov - Climate Momentum Shifting: Prominent Scientists Reverse Belief in Man-made Global Warming--Now Skeptics
epw.senate.gov - Cold facts on global warming
www.worldnetdaily.com - Global Warming? Hot Air! by John Loeffler
www.khouse.org - Global Warming? Hot Air! by Carol Loeffler
www.khouse.org - Gore's 'carbon offsets' paid to firm he owns
www.worldnetdaily.com - Global Warming or Global Governance? (DVD)
- NASA says 1934 was the warmest year on record in the U.S., not 1998
- The Heartland Institute--Global Snowjob
- Junkscience.com--Win $100,000 if you can prove global warming is a crisis
- www.climatedepot.com
Climate Depot - Not Just Evil Just Wrong
http://www.noteviljustwrong.com/
The answer to the two-questions beneath the picture of Noah's Ark on top is "no" to both. The earth was flooded in Noah's day because of sin, not global warming! "The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown. Then the Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually" (Genesis 6:4-5 NASB). "Then God said to Noah, 'The end of all flesh has come before Me; for the earth is filled with violence because of them; and behold, I am about to destroy them with the earth'" (Gen. 6:13 NASB). "I establish My covenant with you; and all flesh shall never again be cut off by the water of the flood, neither shall there again be a flood to destroy the earth. God said, 'This is the sign of the covenant which I am making between Me and you and every living creature that is with you, for all successive generations; I set My bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a sign of a covenant between Me and the earth'" (Gen. 9:11-13 NASB).























